Subject: Call for Programs: the "phonecode" benchmark - DN [1]
prechelt@ira.uka.de (Lutz Prechelt) - 17 Nov 1999 - comp.lang.tcl
Hi all,
- Out of the following set of scripting languages:
Perl, Python, Rexx, Tcl
do you prefer one over the others?
- Do you think one is inherently better than the others?
- Or aren't you sure?
NOW IS THE TIME TO FIND OUT!
I have prepared an interesting small programming problem
and have collected a number of implementations for it in C, C++, Java
and Lisp.
Comparing these programs, one finds that there are substantial
differences between the different languages (such as for program length,
programming time, run time, memory requirements), but that the differences
between the individual implementations even within one language are
even larger.
I would now like to extend this investigation to scripting languages:
o Are differences between implementations using the same language
smaller or even larger than for "standard" programming languages?
o Do systematic differences between different scripting languages
exist?
o How do the scripting languages compare to standard programming
languages such as C or Java?
If you are interested in participating in this investigation
please create an implementation of the "Phonecode" benchmark
problem in your favorite scripting language and submit it to me.
I will make the results available to you after the evaluation.
The effort required is typically somewhere between 1 and 8 hours.
For a description of the programming problem etc., see
http://wwwipd.ira.uka.de/~prechelt/phonecode/
NOTE THAT THIS PROGRAM COLLECTION EFFORT CLOSES AT DECEMBER 18, 1999.
Happy programming!
Lutz
P.S.: You sure know at least ONE other person who might be interested
in this, right? Please tell him or her!
Lutz Prechelt http://wwwipd.ira.uka.de/~prechelt/ | Whenever you
Institut f. Programmstrukturen & Datenorganisation | complicate things,
Universitaet Karlsruhe; 76128 Karlsruhe; Germany | they get
(Phone: +49/721/608-4068, FAX: +49/721/608-7343) | less simple.
>>> Ever had negative research results? http://wwwipd.ira.uka.de/fnr <<<
Last modified
1999-11-25
1999-11-25
(195.108.246.50)
Note: you are looking at
the snapshot of an old wiki
- much of this information
is likely to be very outdated
